Former Burris PR Guy Throws Fuel on Fire
February 24, 2009 by Mark Rose
Filed under News, PR Practices, Politics
Did Bud Jackson really need to issue this self-aggrandizing memo yesterday?
Concerning Senator Roland Burris
Dear Friends, Colleagues, and Members of the Media:
As many of you may recall I actively helped my former client, Roland Burris, during his run-up to being successfully seated in the United States Senate.
Since that time, well … his team’s public relations efforts have been less than stellar. Turns out that, because my business is political communication, I need to let folks know that I have not been involved in the decisions that have led to the public relations fiasco over the past week. In fact, I actively counseled his team to take very different actions, to no avail.
I have not returned countless calls from my friends in the media, partly because my role no longer includes responding to media queries, now that the Senator has his own official staff. If you are a member of the media, please contact Jim O’Connor, the new communications director (being shot out of a cannon) for Senator Burris at his Washington, DC office (202) 224-2852.
I know based on my own private conversations and experience that Senator Roland Burris has been the victim of bad advice and, when set-up to fail, he certainly shall we say, has had less than adequate attempts to better and more clearly inform the public at a press conference, or two. It has been painful to watch. Regardless, the senator has more than 30 years of public service and his integrity has never been questioned. I know that he has done nothing inappropriate despite the impression that has been left.
Despite what may or may not happen as a result of the mess that has been made, I stand behind my former client. To quote the movie Oh, Brother Where Art Thou Senator Burris is “in a tight spot.” It’s an unfortunate distraction for Illinois people who are most concerned about their jobs and their homes. It’s not so bad if you’re a Republican, a Democrat gunning for his seat, or if you’re trying to sell newspapers — they all benefit by painting everything in its worst possible context.
So to sum it all up: it’s complicated.
Sincerely, Bud Jackson
PR/Media Week in Review 02-22-2009
February 23, 2009 by Mark Rose
Filed under Media, News, PR Week in Review, Politics
Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are a vexations to the spirit … Ben Franklin said. Fair bet that ol’ Lightnin’ Ben would not have sidled up to
Rick Santelli, the over caffeinated CNBC financial pundit. Santelli’s rant on CNBC this week about the unconscionable stimulus for the loser homeowners who are dragging down capitalism with their wasteful ways, hit a nerve like dentist’s drill in a root canal.
It is not that Santelli ranted, he does that often. It’s that the White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs responded in a press conference very specifically, with calculated emotion and a touch of humor. This sent CNBC financial pundits into bloviating glee as they circled the wagons to protect their own.
What this is really about can be summed up in a single word: ratings. The Santelli rant was supposedly the most emailed video in the blogosphere for the week and Santelli landed on the morning talk shows. The greatest insult to a ranter is to be ignored.
The Obama administration also boosted its ratings because of this episode. Gibbs did not respond to Santelli entirely off the cuff. He periodically peered down as if he was reading message points. His nearly five minute response to Santelli was clear, concise and specific. On a broader scale he was answering all critics of the homeowner mortgage stimulus. Despite a sudden rash of attention, Gibbs neutralized Santelli, who will sound like a hurt kid in the schoolyard desperately vying for attention if he continues this tack.
Cogent Santelli slapdowns have come from an unlikely source - SeekingAlpha, the most popular finance blog. See a couple of posts: CNBC’s Specious Reporting on the Housing Plan and Rick Santelli: Critic or P.R. Man?
PR? It’s murder.Can U.S. public relations influence the outcome of a murder trial across the Atlantic? The battle over Amanda Knox, dubbed Italy’s ‘Trial of the Century,’ ramped into high gear last week in a courtroom in Perugia, Italy. This story has it all - a vivacious American coed from University of Washington in Seattle, an alleged drug-fueled orgy that led to a grisly murder, conflicting testimonies and relentless spinning of stories to paint the accused, accomplices, prosecutors and legal authorities in a bad light.
Driving the U.S. push for Amanda Knox is a group of students, family and friends from Seattle called Friends of Amanda. They are offered as ‘character witnesses’ to the media. They proclaim Amanda’s innocence, present ‘facts’ of the case colored through their prism, and solicit donations through the Amanda Knox Defense Fund.
The PR battle over Amanda Knox has become so heated that Italian prosecutor in the case Giuliano Mignini is reportedly suing the West Seattle Herald, a small community newspaper, for defamation.
Will these maneuvers impact the trial, expected to last at least six months? Last week the trial began in earnest and the PR spin ramped up. The Beastblogger Barbie Latza Nadeau is covering the case - see Sex and Murder in Italy - and the TV news shows are presenting frequent updates.
“I was asked by ‘Friends of Amanda’ to help turn around this supertanker of bad press over in Italy and get the truth out about Amanda’s innocence,” said Seattle attorney, Anne Bremner. “The prosecution has no forensic evidence at all. Zero. None.” - West Seattle Herald
A-Rod Bunts in PR Press Conference
February 18, 2009 by Mark Rose
Filed under News, PR Practices
In his anti-climactic press conference yesterday at Yankee spring training camp in Tampa, Florida, Alex Rodriguez released some new information and hedged and maneuvered to put this all behind him. He chose to bunt instead of swinging for the fences - another lost opportunity for a high profile athlete to come clean and set a real example for contrition and re-birth.
The New York tabs have not been kind. See He Must Think We’re All Fools and The Truth Be Told, A-Roid Just Can’t (NY Post - graphic below right) — Alex Rodriguez Needs Dose of Truth Serum and A-Rod’s presser a laugher that wasn’t funny (NY Daily News - graphic left)
The tone of the press conference was set by Yankee media relations director Jason Zillo who would not allow follow-up questions from reporters. The press conference lasted a little over a half hour, far less than the 55 minutes Andy Pettitte was grilled at last year’s Yankee steroid shame-fest.
According to Tyler Kepner, The New York Times: “Ben Porritt, a former spokesman for John McCain’s presidential campaign and a partner in the crisis-management firm Outside Eyes, sat off camera as Rodriguez explained and apologized.” Add one more to the A-Rod coterie of PR consultants/image makers/handlers and agents. You wonder if Alex Rodriguez is capable of an honest emotion or thought that is not filtered through consultants.
The press conference was streamed live from several sources such as ESPN, MLB, and YES. What was the point, then, of the live blogging from many news organizations that amounted to a blow-by-blow of what we saw live? The best live blogging on the event came from Alan Schwarz at The New York Times Bats blog. Schwarz added bemused color commentary that portrayed the event as a highly manipulated media circus.
1:52 p.m.
Yankees PR chief Jason Zillo just announced, “There will not be any follow-up questions … to keep this as efficient as possible.” That does not bode well for any revelations, folks. A lot more Q than A.2:13 p.m.
Freudian Slip of the Decade: “I’m here to take my medicine.” Alex Rodriguez, Feb. 17, 20092:19 p.m.
First really good question (and a form of follow-up) came from Mike Vaccaro of The New York Post, who asked Rodriguez why, if he didn’t think what he was taking was wrong, was he so secretive and so reluctant to ask about proper procedure during the 2001-3 seasons. Rodriguez paused for a while, clearly cornered, and said: “That’s a good question. I knew what we were taking weren’t Tic Tacs. I knew that it was, potentially could be something that perhaps was wrong.”I guess it all depends on what your definition of “was” was.
2:27 p.m.
Joel Sherman of The New York Post tried to tie Rodriguez down on the matter of how in the world a $252 million athlete who otherwise takes great care of his body could be, if Rodriguez’s account is accurate, so foolhardy as to not know what he was taking or how to take it. Rodriguez repeated his “young and stupid” defense.
And what is this ‘bole’ that A-Rod said he injected into his body? From Brian’s blog: “Bole” is clearly the Dominican slang for Primobolan.” A-Rod repeatedly said that his cousin secured the drug and they were both young and foolish. I guarantee that several reporters are in the Dominican Republic right now hunting for that cousin who A-Rod would not name.
This story will go on and on, and the damage will continue. A-Rod stepped up to the plate yesterday and struck out. I have a horrible feeling that for all their talent and all their money the Yankees are in for a miserable season, to the delight of baseball fans outside of New York.
A-Rod Show Continues Today
February 17, 2009 by Mark Rose
Filed under News, PR Practices
The pumped up Alex Rodriguez show kicks into high gear at 1:30 PM today at the Yankees spring training camp in Tampa, Florida. A-Rod will face the media en masse after his one-on-one with ESPN’s Peter Gammons last week left a lot of questions. In that interview A-Rod falsely accused Sports Illustrated writer Selena Roberts of stalking him and breaking into his home. A-Rod subsequently apologized to Roberts.
Expect a lot of hardball questions - Exactly what drugs did he take? Where did he get them? What did they do for him? - and some serious deflection and containment by A-Rod.
It is hard to keep up with all of A-Rod’s handlers, managers and advisors (Scott Boras, Guy Oseary, William Morris Agency, Richard Rubenstein). Plus, he supposedly has two therapists to keep his head on straight. Initial reports are that he will not be as open and contrite as Yankee pitcher Andy Pettitte was at last year’s Yankee steroid media confession. That would be a mistake.
What A-Rod and the Yankees want is for this to recede into the background as quickly as possible. Hundreds of baseball players took performance enhancing drugs. Because this is A-Rod - he has assiduously polished his squeaky clean image and he flat out denied taking PED’s before he was caught - he will be hounded and the Yankees will suffer if he does not get it all out at once.
As if A-Rod is not getting enough advice, here is some more: don’t say ‘to be perfectly honest’ and then say you can’t remember what drugs you took, as he did with Gammons. A-Rod is meticulous about his body, his image and his work out regimen. He can only get away with that once.
(top left, Barry Blitt, cover of The New Yorker, Feb. 23, 2009)
PR/Media Week in Review 02-15-2009
News You Can Lose. Every industry deserves the trade press it gets but can’t even lowly PR do better than PRNews? I deleted at least 10 emails from PRNews last week imploring me to buy their books, go to their conferences, attend webinars on media relations, media training, digital whatever… and I am constantly telemarketed to buy the print publication. This despite my blog post 2/5 titled PRNews Stuck in Abacus Land that should have elicited some PR maneuvers or at least notified someone that I am not a good prospect for their stuff .
PRNews obviously knows nothing about PR - anybody who buys their dreck is either naive or over stimulated with stimulus funds. Still, repackaging the same PR ‘intelligence’ in a variety of formats and pushing it out to a resistant audience is apparently paying someone’s bills so we officially launch into that business today with the First Annual Media Relations Guide for PRummies (PR Dummies). We employ our own time-tested, field proven three step approach:
#1: Know your client’s business
#2: Know the media you are pitching
#3: Marry #1 & #2
We will send this ‘intelligence’ out in mass emails, conduct webinars, print books, and hold conferences all around the country. Stay tuned.
A-Rod’s Ass. A-Rod was all over the news last week, including several posts here. This Tuesday he is expected to face the press in the Yankees spring training camp. That should spark another round of A-Rod fueled stories that will only feed his already bloated celebrity. Will Selena Roberts, the Sports Illustrated ’stalker,’ be allowed to participate?
Shrinking Media. Bloomberg announced its first ever layoffs last week. Dozens of staffers are facing the axe. Bloomberg always seemed immune to the pressure of traditional media. Now, with financial services in turmoil and media shrinking rapidly, Bloomberg is joining the rest of the world. Fret not, Mike Bloomberg himself is not hurting. He is able to scrape together $80 million or so for his next campaign to stay Mayor of New York.
Eight is Enough. The Killeen Furtney Group, a west coast PR firm, probably thought it was a good idea to represent octuplets mother Nadya Suleman pro bono. Then they started getting death threats. “They’d put me in the wood chipper and throw me in the bottom of the ocean and hope I die,” Killeen said. The Group decided last week that they will consider other ways to spend their non-billable time.
Rubenstein PR Fingerprints On A-Rod’s Ass
February 13, 2009 by Mark Rose
Filed under News, PR Practices
Who is covering Alex Rodriguez’s ass in his latest media imbroglio? Richard Rubenstein (left, in blue shirt and pink tie), estranged son of the famous ‘Czar of PR’ Howard Rubenstein, has confirmed that he is guarding the posterior of the best slugger in baseball.
What can Richard do for A-Rod that his weasel agent Scott Boras or his other agent Guy Oseary can’t? Richard isn’t talking but A-Rod’s ‘confession‘ has all the earmarks of aggressive PR hardball and a challenge to the media to back off. A-Rod was vague about what drugs he may have taken but specific about who the real enemy is - Sports Illustrated writer Selena Roberts. When you want to divert attention from the topic, you shoot the messenger - that’s hardball PR.
Richard’s father, Howard, has represented George Steinbrenner for years so that avenue is off limits to A-Rod. Howard’s other son, Steven, is heir to the elder Rubenstein’s empire but Richard has carved out his own mini-empire representing an odd conglomeration of small public companies, rappers, entertainers, and real estate moguls (he’s promoted several Trump projects).
See Gawker post on dueling memos between 5W honcho Ronn Torossian and Richard Rubenstein - two blustering schmegeggis who can’t spell and can’t write threatening each other with holy terror and lawsuits. These guys are … what? … 12 years old?
Bright Spots Amidst Troubled PR Biz, Says Comp Guru
February 12, 2009 by Mark Rose
Filed under News, PR Practices
The much-anticipated Official PR Salary & Bonus Report© - 2009 Edition reveals the grim reality we all face - PR jobs are scarce, salaries are flat, bonuses are being slashed dramatically. Bottom line - if you have a job, hold on to it. If you think you have a fat bonus coming to you - think again. Bonuses are down an average of 34% vs. a 9% rise last year, according to the report.

PR pros at agencies and corporations are working harder, says Dennis Spring (top, left), President of Spring Associates, the New York-based executive recruitment firm. As PR staffs shrink, fewer employed execs are expected to pick up the slack. We are in an employer’s market - a world away from where we were last year. Ironically, this situation could spell opportunity for some.
“There have been ‘defensive layoffs’ that have left some agencies and corporate PR departments short staffed,” says Spring. “They cut PR staff anticipating the recession and now they find they need more experienced people.” Spring sees spotty hiring in health care, high tech, some consumer areas and IR (investor relations). Financial PR is lagging.
The 2009 Official PR Salary & Bonus Report is compiled from Spring Associates’ proprietary database of more than 20,000 credentialed corporate communications and agency public relations professionals nationwide. Spring Associates collects data on a daily basis from direct contact with PR professionals. This is 13th annual Report.
The Report is used by C-suite execs, managers, HR people, department heads, anybody who needs accurate information on PR salaries, bonuses and compensation trends, says Spring.
Spring Associates offers a free salary check-up exclusively for PR professionals.
PR AGENCY SALARY SNAPSHOT
| Position | Average Salaries - Nationwide | % change from 2008 |
| Executive vice president | $147,100 | 2.9 |
| Senior vice president | 125,700 | 2.2 |
| Vice president | 104,400 | 2.3 |
| Account supervisor | 72,900 | 1.3 |
| Senior account executive | 59,400 | 2.4 |
| Account executive | 52,100 | 4.2 |
| Position | NY, Atlanta, Chicago, L.A. | % change from 2008 |
| Executive vice president | $167,600 | 2.4 |
| Senior vice president | 143,700 | 2.6 |
| Vice president | 117,800 | 2.6 |
| Account supervisor | 82,900 | 2.2 |
| Senior account executive | 68,400 | 2.1 |
| Account executive | 57,200 | 3.2 |
| Position | Boston, Dallas/Houston, D.C., S.F. | % change from 2008 |
| Executive vice president | $147,300 | 2.3 |
| Senior vice president | 130,800 | 2.2 |
| Vice president | 105,100 | 2.0 |
| Account supervisor | 77,200 | 3.0 |
| Senior account executive | 64,000 | 3.0 |
| Account executive | 58,900 | 4.1 |
| Source: “The Official PR Salary & Bonus Report” - 2009 Edition, Spring Associates, Inc., New York, NY | ||
CORPORATE SALARY SNAPSHOT
| Position | Average Salaries – Nationwide | % change from 2008 |
| Senior vice president | $164,000 | 1.9 |
| Vice president | 144,000 | 1.4 |
| Director | 126,000 | 1.6 |
| Manager | 98,700 | 1.8 |
| Communications Specialist | 75,200 | 3.0 |
| Position | NY, Atlanta, Chicago, L.A. | % change from 2008 |
| Senior vice president | 179,600 | 2.5 |
| Vice president | 160,400 | 2.5 |
| Director | 141,600 | 2.0 |
| Manager | 106,000 | 2.9 |
| Communications Specialist | 80,000 | 2.6 |
| Position | Boston, Dallas/Houston, D.C., S.F. | % change from 2008 |
| Senior vice president | 169,000 | 1.8 |
| Vice president | 150,100 | 1.2 |
| Director | 134,000 | 3.9 |
| Manager | 106,200 | 2.7 |
| Communications Specialist | 81,700 | 4.7 |
| Source: “The Official PR Salary & Bonus Report” - 2009 Edition, Spring Associates, Inc., New York, NY | ||
A-Rod Slams Media in PR Home Run
February 10, 2009 by Mark Rose
Filed under News, PR Practices
Alex Rodriguez’s interview yesterday with ESPN (see video below) was a masterstroke of PR message and obfuscation. A-Rod was clear that his use of PEDs (performance enhancing drugs) was contained to a “naive, stupid” time of his career with Texas when the culture of baseball was “loosey goosey.” He has been clean since he joined the Yankees and he implored us to look at the consistency and longevity of his career and not judge him harshly for an anomaly he regrets.
Since this is A-Rod he always appears to be holding back more than he is revealing and he is jockeying to enhance and protect an image clean enough for a Wheaties box (at least he didn’t get caught smoking pot like Michael Phelps). New Yorkers like honesty and they like winners, A-Rod said. All true enough, but what’s this bit about Selena Roberts (top,left) , the Sports Illustrated reporter who broke the A-Rod PED story, stalking him and spreading lies?
Selena Roberts is a highly accomplished sports reporter. When she was with The New York Times she wrote insightful stories about A-Rod and his damaged psyche hurting the team. She is coming out with a book on A-Rod in May that apparently he will not like since he consistently referred to her as something of a journalistic svengali.
Sports Illustrated published a Q & A with Roberts, in which the reporter talks about the process of breaking the story and her efforts to speak with Rodriguez. She also calls the slugger’s claims “absurd” in an interview with MLB Network.
“”I’ve never set foot in the lobby of Alex’s New York apartment. I’ve never set foot on his property. It’s pure fabrication,” said Roberts, who did say she drove by Rodriguez’s house after receiving permission from Miami Beach police to drive on public property near A-Rod’s house. The Miami Beach police have a “miscellaneous incident” report of that conversation, but Roberts was not cited for anything.
Roberts also asked for and received permission from security at the University of Miami to enter the school’s workout facilities and talk to Rodriguez on Thursday. “I think it’s a diversion, a shoot-the-messenger type of thing,” Roberts said.




